Category Archives: Weather Modification

Geoengineering Begins Spring 2019: Spray the Skies to Cool the Planet

David DuByne creator of the ADAPT 2030 channel on YouTube discusses societal changes as our Earth shifts to a cooler climate as the Eddy Grand Solar Minimum intensifies, a 400-year cycle in our Sun which will affect crop production, the economy and everyone on our planet. This is a timeline for what you can expect from now to 2023.

•First geoengineering experiments begin Spring 2019 undertaken by Harvard University

•Plans to dim the sunlight striking Earth are on track Spring 2019

•Aerial spraying of calcium carbonate or sulfur dioxide

•Cover the planet with trees before we spray Earth’s skies

•Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment (SCOPEX)

•Flip New NASA report, global warming promotes Arctic Sea Ice Growth

•Dirtiest polluters on the planet are ships using bunker fuel

•India and China continue to pollute unchecked

•Temperatures will cool naturally because of the Eddy Grand Solar Minimum so SCOPEX will take credit for cooling the planet in their program

• for patents already filed involving geoengineering since the late 1940’s

•Artificial trees

•Tambora Eruption Year Without a Summer


Extinction Level Event Begins Spring 2019 as Harvard Public Geoengineering Goes Live

Geoengineering tests are being public announced by Harvard University, the Solar Geoengineering Research Program is now public. So much for the conspiracy, Firsts spray trials will begin in early 2019 with calcium carbonate injected into cloud layers using a tethered balloon to begin with, moving to a fleet of aircraft at full roll out. The plan is to mimic a Pinatubo eruption level event to cool the planet by 0.6C within 15 months, termed rapid cooling. This will occur the same time the planet begins to cool as the Grand Solar Minimum intensifies, so it appears Harvard is trying to give itself success in the aerosol spraying program to cool the planet, but in actuality its the Sun in its 400 year cycle. The program will be indefinite due to “termination shock” and full reversal to global warming conditions if they stop. Global taxes to follow, new Geoengineering Taxes, no longer CO2 tax, they switched the narrative.

Controversial spraying method aims to curb global warming

CBS News
23 November 2018
Jeff Berardelli

NEW YORK — A fleet of 100 planes making 4,000 worldwide missions per year could help save the world from climate change. Also, it may be relatively cheap. That’s the conclusion of a new peer-reviewed study in Environmental Research Letters.

It’s the stuff of science fiction. Planes spraying tiny sulphate particulates into the lower stratosphere, around 60,000 feet up. The idea is to help shield the Earth from just enough sunlight to help keep temperatures low.

The researchers examined how practical and costly a hypothetical solar geoengineering project would be beginning 15 years from now. The aim would be to half the temperature increase caused by heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

This method would mimic what large volcanoes do. In 1991, Mount Pinatubo erupted in the Philippines. It was the second largest eruption of the 20th century, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS).


The second-largest volcanic eruption of this century, and by far the largest eruption to affect a densely populated area, occurred at Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines on June 15, 1991.


In total, the eruption injected 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide aerosols into the stratosphere. USGS said the Earth’s lower atmosphere temperature dropped by approximately 1-degree Fahrenheit. The effect only lasted a couple of years because the sulfates eventually fell to Earth.

Although controversial, some think that trying to mimic the impacts of a volcano eruption is a viable way to control global warming. This proposed type of climate geoengineering is called stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). Theoretically if done at scale — and sustained — the impact can be large. The 1-degree temperature drop which accompanied Mount Pinatubo’s eruption is equal to about half of the human-caused warming Earth has experienced since the Industrial Revolution began.


In this handout photo from Climate Central, they say scientists are looking at a variety of technologies —  from snatching carbon dioxide out of the air like trees do, to launching giant mirrors into space — to artificially slow global warming.


Dr. Gernot Wagner from Harvard University is an author of the paper. He said their study shows this type of geoengineering “… would be technically possible strictly from an engineering perspective. It would also be remarkably inexpensive, at an average of around $2 to 2.5 billion per year over the first 15 years.”

But to reach that point, the study said an entirely new aircraft needs to be developed. Partly because missions would need to be conducted at nearly double the cruising altitude of commercial airplanes. The study’s co-authorWake Smithexplained, “No existing aircraft has the combination of altitude and payload capabilities required.”

So, the team investigated what it would cost to develop an aircraft they dub the SAI Lofter (SAIL). They say its fuselage would have a stubby design and the wing area — as well as the thrust — would need to be twice as large. In total, the team estimates the development cost for the airframe to be $2 billion and $350 million to modify existing engines.

In their hypothetical plan, the fleet would start with eight planes in the first year and rise to just under 100 within 15 years. In year one, there would be 4,000 missions, increasing to just over 60,000 per year by year 15. As you can see, this would need to be a sustained and escalating effort.

As one may imagine, a concept like this comes with a lot of controversy. Like treating a fever with aspirin, this type of engineering only treats the symptoms, it does not fix the root cause of the warming: Escalating levels of heat trapping greenhouse gases produced by the burning of fossil fuels.

The American Meteorological Society (AMS) expressed concerns that the possibility of seemingly quick and inexpensive fixes will distract the public and policymakers from addressing the underlying problems and developing adaptation strategies. And if for whatever reason the aerosol missions stopped, within a few years the temperatures would shoot up at breakneck pace. A pace that would likely be too fast for humanity to adjust.

The AMS official policy statement regarding this type of geoengineering begins with a warning, “Reflecting sunlight would likely reduce Earth’s average temperature but could also change global circulation patterns with potentially serious consequences such as changing storm tracks and precipitation patterns.”

In other words, the atmosphere is complex. Any band-aid fix is bound to have unintended consequences and possibly cause a new set of problems. The AMS goes on to say results of reflecting sunlight “would almost certainly not be the same for all nations and peoples, thus raising legal, ethical, diplomatic and national security concerns.” One region may become a desert, while others become flooded out.

And if we learn to control SAI to tailor a favorable result, there’s the concern it may be used for the disproportionate benefit of one nation over another. In a 2017 study in the publication Nature Communications, the authors warn their work “… reemphasizes the perils of unilateral geoengineering, which might prove attractive to individual actors due to a greater controllability of local climate responses, but with inherent additional risk elsewhere.”

But perhaps the greatest reason to be skeptical of aerosol solar sunlight management is that it’s not a silver bullet. As carbon dioxide continues to increase, the oceans are becoming increasingly acidic. According to NOAA, ocean acidification can cascade through the ocean food chain, reducing the ability of shell fish and reef-building corals to produce their skeletons. Injecting aerosols into the stratosphere simply limits sunshine, it does not tackle the underlying carbon dioxide build up. The ocean would continue to acidify.

Despite the potential drawbacks, the AMS does recognize — even with aggressive mitigation — we can’t avoid some dangerous consequences of climate changealready baked into the system. Plus, the scale of human adaptation is limited. Therefore, they urge caution and continued research.

The AMS policy statement closes with: “Geoengineering will not substitute for either aggressive mitigation or proactive adaptation, but it could contribute to a comprehensive risk management strategy to slow climate change and alleviate some of its negative impacts. The potential to help society cope with climate change and the risks of adverse consequences imply a need for adequate research, appropriate regulation and transparent deliberation.”

In the name of saving the earth: Geoengineering will be a necessary evil, says United Nations body

Source: Can Tech Letter
Date: 4 November 2016
Author: Jayson MacLean

In a new and particularly foreboding report, the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity warns that using geoengineering to combat global warming should be considered a “highly uncertain” prospect, one whose future impact on the planet’s biodiversity is still unclear. Continue reading In the name of saving the earth: Geoengineering will be a necessary evil, says United Nations body

Bloomberg: Geoengineering: The Bad Idea We Need to Stop Climate Change

Source:Bloomberg (Note that the link the source will be at the bottom of article rather than at the top)
Date: 11 February 2016
Author: Eric Roston

The 2013 movie Snowpiercer took a fanciful look at what might happen if human attempts to engineer the climate were to go awry. A pair of reports from the National Research Council offers a sober, reality-based look. Photographer: Weinstein Company/Everett Collection

Maybe the problem with climate change isn’t that we’ve messed with the earth too much. Or maybe we haven’t messed with it enough.

The National Research Council, which writes fat, independent reports on complicated topics for policymakers, has at last weighed in on the utility— and possible consequences—of re-engineering the planet to ease global warming’s worst impacts. It’s called geoengineering, and with a name like that, what could go wrong? Never mind the instantaneous global ice age conjured in Snowpiercer, in which cooling chemicals poured into the atmosphere go awry. Continue reading Bloomberg: Geoengineering: The Bad Idea We Need to Stop Climate Change

10 Reasons why you should not believe in global warming and climate change alarmism

Matthew Miller EL founder and bloggerSource: Eco Liberty
Date: 18 February 2016
Author: Matthew Miller, Eco Liberty founder and blogger

It funny that people been told that the earth is warming and we to be blamed for all that warming and they believe it without question. And you been bought into the shame and panic that we are blame for the global warming of this planet. But is it true? Or is it a political movement for a political agenda; tyrannical governments in the past have use the environment as a excuse for their political agenda. Look like the environmental movement today is pushing for One World Government and doing through scientific fraud by tampering with data which they are recorded temperature throughout the centuries and decade; so it fit with their political agenda. This environmental political agenda is based the Marxist ideology which that doesn’t support for humankind throughout the world for a better world but bring in a one world totalitarian government which that total enslavement of all human beings throughout the world. Here 10 reasons you must do all in your power not to fall in and believe in the Global warming or Climate Change hypocrisy . And if you’ve were a believe and you just that all that Global warming and Climate change is not a problem I highly recommend you read this article further. But the alarmist would say “you’re a climate change denier.” Don’t listen to those climate alarmists they will try bully you and call you names but can ignore them or say “so what” Continue reading 10 Reasons why you should not believe in global warming and climate change alarmism

“UNconventional Grey” Geoengineering and the Climate Change Agenda

Our goals in “An UNConventional Shade of Grey”

“An Unconventional Shade of Grey” is a call to action film. We are currently moving forward with the Aerosol Collection Project where we are taking airplanes into the aerosol plumes and testing the contaminants. Positive tests will provide us with inarguable court admissible evidence proving that geoengineering is occurring and changing/manipulating our climate. Our goals are to expand the aerosol collection project and then bring evidence into courts around the world with the goal of reversing climate agreements, related laws and mandates and thus; stopping geoengineering. It is only then that we can determine weather the planet is warming or cooling. Again, if the climate agreement is passed, it will provide the framework to legalize geoengineering programs worldwide without our input and remove our ability to take legal and legislative action. Proving that climate models are incorrect (due to ongoing geoengineering) is the most effective way to stop these damaging programs. Demanding that all climate related legislation is halted until our air is free from geoengineering is the only way to prove any accuracy of climate models. It literally forces those who are supportive of climate change legislation to support stopping geoengineering. We have the airplane, collection devices and scientific team.

We absolutely need your support to bring this information to the masses
We have the airplane, collection devices and scientific team. We need your support to pay for the flight and to document this historic test and project.

“An Unconventional Shade of Grey” is a call to action film that is expected to provide the data and call to action plan to the word. Because a collective effort is required, we need your support. Please go to: to learn how you can become and Angel and/or Pre-order the film. This is how we were able to fund and wake millions of people up around the world with “WHAT and WHY in the World are They Spraying?” Be a part of the film and process that will stop geoengineering for good!!!