Gun Control: A Tyrant’s Tool in World History
10 November 2014
AWR Hawkins

Gun control is a tool that individual tyrants and various colonial rulers the world over have used to place—and keep—entire populations in a defenseless and subjective posture. 

Three examples that clearly illustrate the truth of this are Cambodia, China, and Nazi Germany.

Cambodia became a protectorate of France in 1893. And according to the Texas Review of Law and Politics (TRLP), the French government first introduced gun control into country in 1920, when they “restricted” the carrying of firearms. In 1938 “a rigorous system of gun licensing” was also put in place. After this, the gradual but certain chipping away at gun rights continued until—by 1953—”gun possession for self-defense, target-shooting, or collecting was banned.”

France pushed gun control because they feared an uprising, especially from Communists or anti-colonial insurgencies. Therefore, just as Democrats in 19th century America took pains to keep slaves from arming themselves and rising up, so too France took pains to be sure those within their protectorate could not rise up against them. 

It is worth noting that France’s efforts to disarm the Cambodian people gained so much momentum that gun control was still in place in 1956, three years after Cambodia was granted independence. Servility ran deep. 

TRLP also shows that Mao Tse-tung used guns to take control of China in 1949. Thereafter, he “disarmed the Chinese people” yet simultaneously claimed to rule in their name. Then, with a government that was armed to the teeth versus a people who had no means for self-defense, Mao “perpetrated the largest mass murder in the history of the world, killing approximately 20 million people.”

Chinese people were denied the dignity of private gun ownership for self-defense and were then slaughtered on a grand scale.

Enter World War II Germany, and words like Nazi, Auschwitz, Dachau, and Adolf Hilter immediately stir our minds to consider the level of atrocity one tyrant can perpetrate against an unarmed people. 

Breitbart News previously reported that Stephen P. Halbrook’s Gun Control in the Third Reich shines a light on Hitler’s use of gun control against the Jewish people and other “enemies of the state.” Hitler and his party implemented gun control systematically, like France did with the Cambodians, but he did so with far greater quickness, like Mao in China. 

Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in January 1933 and immediately began pushing for total power—for complete control of every aspect of government. One part of this pursuit was ridding himself of political and state enemies, and one way to accomplish this was by disarming those who could be described as “enemies of the state” or dangers within the state.

In October 1933, bans on the possessions of firearms by “persons dangerous to security” were drafted. One month later—on November 21—a more detailed draft made clear that National Socialists would enjoy the ability to buy firearms but other persons would not. Thus there was actually a push to relax gun laws—as far they applied to National Socialists—while simultaneously tightening them as they applied to “enemies of the state” and/or “subject races.”

A memorandum accompanying the November 21 gun control draft said: “The prerequisite for any relaxation of the current firearm law, however, is that the sentencing and police authorities proceed with merciless severity against any possession of a weapon by any enemy of the people and the state.”

Halbrook shows that by 1938, Hitler discarded the generic “enemy of the state” phraseology and simply said what he really meant—Jewish people could not own or possess guns. 

On November 10, 1938, German papers carried the news: “Jews Forbidden to Possess Weapons By Order of SS Reichsfuhrer Himmler, Munich, November 10.” The news was accompanied by this warning: “Persons who, according to the Nurnberg law, are regarded as Jews, are forbidden to possess any weapon. Violators will be condemned to a concentration camp and imprisoned for a period of up to 20 years.”

On November 9, 1938, a Jewish person could lawfully possess certain weapons. On November 10, they could not, and they faced a stiff prison sentence for doing otherwise. In 1942, unarmed Jews were sent to concentration camps and shot to death, gassed to death, starved to death, and killed in other ways too horrible to fathom. 

According to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, some “six million Jews” were killed in this fashion. And that number does not include other unarmed “enemies of the state” who were killed in horrible ways as well. 

Gun control is a tyrant’s tool. 

homicides by persons holding firearms licences in NZ since 1998

Only 15 firearm licence holder have committed murder in the last 20 years according the NZ Police records. So do we think Jacinda’s new Gun laws is going to fix that?

Waikanae Watch

As expected, PM Jacinda initiated her semi-automatic firearms ban, but the statistics below contained in an OIA response last December and reproduced on the Police website show why until last Friday there wasn’t an issue.

The next terrorist (and Islamic State have called for an attack in retaliation) will need to obtain an assault rifle illegally, use bombs (the most popular choice for Muslim terrorists overseas) on drones or in a truck, or just use a big truck to mow people down as has happened in overseas cities like Nice, Berlin, Stockholm, Barcelona, London…

Hmm.  Is Jacinda going to fix the real reason last Friday happened — big time security intelligence failure?

Police OIA-1

Police OIA-2

View original post

Monsanto loses millions of dollars after Indian farmers switch to indigenous seeds
9 March 2017
Ruth Milka

Monsanto claims that the genetically modified cotton seeds they sell are superior. So why are so many people trying to switch?

Monsanto is losing millions of dollars now that farmers in India are switching to indigenous cotton seeds rather than Bt cotton.

The agrochemical company is known for pushing a form of Bt cotton in India for the last decade. They have been accused of manipulating laws in order to enter the Indian market.

Monsanto’s manipulation and greed in India has caused hundreds of thousands of Indian farmers to commit suicide. Between the years of 1995 and 2013, more than 300,000 farmer suicides occurred, many of which were linked to Monsanto. Farmers are forced to pay for Monsanto’s costly seeds, which then force them to pay for the expensive pesticides to effectively grow them, as Bt cotton’s pest resistant quality fades over time.

These farmers are losing their lands, and their livelihoods, due to the debt they incur trying to afford Monsanto’s products. Many of the farmers drink the chemical insecticides in order to commit suicide.

But recently the Indian government has been promoting the use of indigenous seeds as an alternative. In the past year Monsanto has lost $75 million in royalties from the switch. As Keshav Raj Kranthi of India’s Central Institute for Cotton Research stated, “Just wait for the crucial three to four years to see a complete, natural turnaround. By then most farmers will give up Bt cotton and go for the indigenous variety.”

Monsanto claims that the genetically modified cotton seeds they sell are superior, but places in West Africa, where Monsanto is similarly pushing their Bt seeds, rejected the gm seeds after finding it produced poor quality cotton.

A Recipe For Elderberry Syrup – The Blonde Butter Maker

Also on Bitchute:

The European Elder bush has a long history in Europe of being a healing shrub. Both the flowers and berries of this plant provide us with medicinal uses. We can rediscover this wonderful plant by making an elderberry syrup with the dried berries very easily at home. Elderberries can aid our bodies’ natural defenses against viral infections. Remember to trust in your body’s divine power to heal. Symptoms of sicknesses are purposeful and play an important role in healing from illness. Complacency is poison, but a return to traditionalism is the antidote.

1 cup dried elderberries
2 cups water
1 inch piece of ginger
1 cup honey

Bring 2 cups of water to a boil. Stir in 1 cup of elderberries and ginger. Cover and let simmer for 45 minutes. Pour through strainer and add 1 cup of honey.

10 Ways People in the 1800s Survived the Cold Winters

How did people survive winters in the past? Today, you can just flip on the heat in your home when it’s cold outside. However, staying warm took a lot more effort back in the 19th century. There were lots of creative yet odd ways people used to keep from freezing back in the day.

Focusing on the hands 0:41
Keeping the bed warm 1:59
A crazy amount of layers 2:51
Hanging out in the kitchen 3:48
Close living quarters 4:43
Spending a night out at the pub 5:13
Cleverly designed home decor 5:54
Foot warmers 7:29>br> Wearing fur 8:07
An open fire in the house 8:57
Eco Liberty Conclusion: Although there is more than 10 way to keep warm but the video from Bright Side give you an idea how people kept themselves warm in the winters in the 19th century especially in the Dalton Minimum and the year without a summer when the massive volcano erupted on island of Sumbawa peasant day Indonesia. The volcano that erupted in 1815 was a VEI 7 eruption and impacted the climate around the globe reducing temperature and caused the following year without a summer. This video give you an idea will be useful for the next oncoming solar minimum which that may occur in the near future this century. Having to survive without electricity to you going to need know how. Here link to wanted to know how to make hot water without electricity which that is going to be useful when the powers gird fails and when you run out of gas that you for heating and cooking. Hot water going to be key to keeping yourself clean and warm. Do you find this useful for the upcoming solar minimum or if you know I’m missing something let me know in the commits below.

Australian official: Climate change is a U.N.-led conspiracy to establish a new world order
22 February 2019
Vicki Batts

(Natural News) Climate change controversy continues to grow, with an increasing number of skeptics coming forward to speak out. Now, a top adviser to former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has just declared that global warming is a conspiracy pushed by a power-hungry United Nations.

Maurice Newman, chief business adviser to former PM Abbott, says that the global warming hoax has nothing to do with Earth’s climate, and everything to do with the United Nation’s establishing itself as an authoritarian regime.

For years, climate change skeptics have faced insults and ridicule for daring to defy scientific convention. but with a growing body of scientific evidence to dispel climate change mythology, it is clear that skepticism is more than justified.

Denouncing climate change

Maurice Newman says that irrespective of what climate data indicates, it has become increasingly obvious that the United Nations is using climate change as a vehicle to expand its power.

“This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the U.N.,” Newman reportedly stated in a piece for The Australian.

“It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective,” he contended further.

Newman noted further that the overwhelming majority of studies “proving” the link between CO2 emissions and climate change are now known to be erroneous.

Two decades’ worth of climate stability should be enough proof that the climate catastrophe we’ve been hearing about isn’t actually happening. But, as Newman posits, climate change may be less about saving the Earth and more about growing authoritarianism.

“The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook. Eco-catastrophists [ …] have captured the U.N. and are extremely well funded. They have a hugely powerful ally in the White House,” Newman states.

Climate change has been an immensely polarizing topic in Australia. Former PM Malcolm Turnbull was recalled over his stance on climate change, while new PM Scott Morrison is making waves by refusing to kowtow to climate fear-mongering. PM Morrison recently revealed that the “land down under” would no longer be contributing to global climate funds.

The climate hoax unravels

Environmentalist groups have been quick to chastise climate change skeptics as being “anti-science,” — even in the face of overwhelming evidence that much of what the majority believes about climate change has been proven false — or worse, faked.

Natural News has been reporting on the fraudulent nature of most climate science for years.

As Mike Adams, founder of Natural News and creator of, reported in 2017,  new evidence shows the climate change models peddled by the IPCC are completely false. Adams reports:

The paper, authored by Myles R. Allen, Richard J. Millar and others, reveals that global warming climate models are flat wrong, having been deceptively biased toward “worst case” warming predictions that now turn out to be paranoid scare mongering.”

As Adams notes further, this research proves current models used by IPCC “wildly” overstate the potential impact of CO2 emissions on the global climate. The so-called “hockey stick” data is a fraud.

A recent review has also shown that so-called scientists have been deliberately altering sea level data to create the impression that sea levels are rising. As the reviewers report, data actually indicated that sea levels were stable — until fraudsters manually changed the data to make it fit their narrative.

The leading science on climate change is marred by fraudulent data, manipulation of science and a total lack of integrity — and it is no small wonder that skepticism is growing.

See more coverage of climate fraud and other hoaxes at

Sources for this article include:

31,487 Scientists Say Global Warming is a Hoax — They’re Speaking Out Against Junk Science
2 March 2019
Lance D Johnson, Guest author

Over 31,000 scientists have united against the political agenda of global warming. The scientific consensus, which includes over 9,000 scientists with Ph.D.s, supports the necessity of carbon dioxide and sheds light on the agenda of global warming, which includes industrial energy rationing, central economic planning, and global taxation schemes.

These scientists are now speaking out against the hoax of global warming and how global agreements to limit greenhouse gases are actually destructive to all plant and animal life on the planet.

The petition, which includes important peer-reviewed research, is backed by various scientists with a wide spectrum of expertise. 

The petition warns the United States about signing international treaties that only put a financial burden on the citizens of the country, steal national sovereignty, and restrict its energy production. The global warming alarmism, in other words, is pseudo-warfare designed to take down a country.

A letter from Frederick Seitz, President of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, is also being circulated with the petition. The letter warns about the flawed science against carbon dioxide. 

Carbon dioxide is essentially a miracle molecule of life, not a dangerous pollutant that needs to be eradicated from the atmosphere. His letter also shines a light on the dangers of the U.S. entering global treaties which will ration energy and confiscate the Nation’s wealth.

Just because climate alarmist Al Gore can walk a stage, point to a graph, and correlate rising temperatures over oceans with a rise in greenhouse gases, does not make global warming a real issue or some kind of “settled science” that is going to destroy the planet.

Al Gore Made Nearly $200 Million from the Global Warming Scam — Likely to Become the World’s First ‘Carbon Billionaire’

As the scientists point out, the vapor pressure of CO2 over sea water is temperature dependent. It’s natural for the two data sets to go up together. It’s not something to be alarmed about.

The petition urges elected leaders to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December 1997 and all other proposals similar in nature. Thankfully, President Trump broke the U.S. free from the Paris Climate Accord [which is GENOCIDE Against Plants, Forests and All Life on Our Planet]

Removing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide would actually hurt the planet, taking away the compound that plants need to thrive. If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to double plant growth?

The petition and its accompanying research dispel the myth that projected carbon dioxide levels are going to cause a catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and the disruption of climate. The evidence is actually in favor of greenhouse gases, which are beneficial to plant and animal environments on Earth. 

The petition also takes aim at the global warming agenda, and says that it will hinder the advancement of science and technology around the world. The confiscation of U.S. energy output is a threat to U.S. sovereignty and the nation’s ability to offer aid to other countries. 

What if climate change alarmists just took a deep breath, exhaled some carbon dioxide, and actually focused on real pollutants that are plaguing our environment and health?

MIT Climatologist Richard Lindzen on the Politics of Global Warming: 

A freedom to exist both ecological and economical